That was an interesting montage of videos. The Great Controversy is actually quite simple but because people refuse to fear God and give Him glory, they will suffer the same eternal punishment as satan, the final death. When you see the papacy, whom satan has given great power, demand worship on the false Sabbath, Sunday, the first day of the week. When the USA will enforce through law (the image to the beast) worldwide, you will know Jesus is coming very soon. “REMEMBER” THE SABBATH TO KEEP IT HOLY...the seventh day, not the first. satan’s crowning achievement, our victory. God’s laws are unchangeable yet mere men think, through satan’s lies, that they can become immortal without God. Does it surprise me that Jewish men are supporters of satan? Who was Judas? The Sanhedrin? Didn’t Klaus Schwab’s dad sell out his brethren? Who, through their influence, did they use to murder Jesus? The Roman Empire. The papacy is the little horn that came up among the ten, speaking blasphemous words against the Most High. Please read The Great Controversy by Ellen G. White, I think you’ll find it interesting. Thanks for the video’s.
The article you share has many things that are conjecture on the part of the author. For instance, where the author says this: “God accepted the offering from Abel, but rejected the offering of Cain because he was unworthy, that is, he was of the serpent.” Here is scripture from Gen 4:4-5a:
4And Abel, he also brought off the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
5but unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect.
Because Adam gave a sin offering, as required, pointing to our Redeemer, Jesus, his offering was accepted of God, whereas, Cain’s offering was of his own merits, not acceptable to God. A classic illustration of satan and men who think they can lower God to their sinful standards-pride-putting themselves in the place of God.
Then the author goes on to say this:
“He wedded a woman of pre-Adamite stock, and thus compounded his fault. Genesis 43:7 says, "Cain knew [that is, had relations with] his wife." That Cain's wife was of forbidden or strange flesh is borne out later, in Jude 11, in referring to the men of Sodom and Gomorrah, "Woe unto them! for they have gone the way of Cain," that is, seeking after strange flesh.”
Pre-Adamite stock? Where do you find that in the Holy Scriptures? People get themselves in trouble when they go to “outside” sources for their information, that is not inspired by the Holy Spirit. It leads them to trust in the traditions of men instead of God’s Word.
This is what Jude says:
10But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
11Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
12These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear…
Cain did not fear the Lord and did things according to his natural inclinations, which were evil, as he had cultivated continuously, the same ultimate sin that the men of Sodom and Gomorrah committed. Yes, they went after strange flesh, which was a “natural” degradation when following their own ways, born from the sins of refusing to follow and give glory to God, based on their pride of self.
We only need to trace through the history of mankind and their refusal of God’s love, it only leads to evil, continuously.
The author has a biased view because he is trying to weave everything together to come to a conclusion, so he uses sources that lead to his conjectures.
This author also states this:
“Naamah's revelries with her blood relative, Ham, resulted in the Curse of Canaan”
This is what scripture says:
Genesis 9:18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan….24And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
25And he said, Cursed be Canaan;
Ham was the middle son, yet Noah knew what his YOUNGER son had done unto him, as Canaan is referred to twice within this narrative. Back then, they didn’t refer to them as grandsons, they were referred to as sons. Thus, while reading the scriptures without preconceived notions, it would appear that Canaan raped his grandfather Noah and was discovered by Ham, who went and told his two brothers.
I also like to reflect on the Word, letting scripture interpret scripture, understanding the words they used then may be misinterpreted because of our definitions for those words now. That is why we can’t cherry-pick scripture. It misrepresents the true meaning and context, causing confusion-satan’s usual ploy. I also enjoy our conversations, it solidifies my faith in God and His Word. Blessings
"Every country has it's own problems, it's indigenous people and it's wildlife."
- Edmond de Rothschild
A strange phrase to use for a native english speaker.
(About 3 minutes before the end of video 2.)
That was an interesting montage of videos. The Great Controversy is actually quite simple but because people refuse to fear God and give Him glory, they will suffer the same eternal punishment as satan, the final death. When you see the papacy, whom satan has given great power, demand worship on the false Sabbath, Sunday, the first day of the week. When the USA will enforce through law (the image to the beast) worldwide, you will know Jesus is coming very soon. “REMEMBER” THE SABBATH TO KEEP IT HOLY...the seventh day, not the first. satan’s crowning achievement, our victory. God’s laws are unchangeable yet mere men think, through satan’s lies, that they can become immortal without God. Does it surprise me that Jewish men are supporters of satan? Who was Judas? The Sanhedrin? Didn’t Klaus Schwab’s dad sell out his brethren? Who, through their influence, did they use to murder Jesus? The Roman Empire. The papacy is the little horn that came up among the ten, speaking blasphemous words against the Most High. Please read The Great Controversy by Ellen G. White, I think you’ll find it interesting. Thanks for the video’s.
Agreed.
To continue your point, if you do not mind:
Cain and Able.
Canaanites.
Romulus and Remus.
Romans.
Abel & Cain. Interesting read.
https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=mullins&book=canaan&story=cain
The article you share has many things that are conjecture on the part of the author. For instance, where the author says this: “God accepted the offering from Abel, but rejected the offering of Cain because he was unworthy, that is, he was of the serpent.” Here is scripture from Gen 4:4-5a:
4And Abel, he also brought off the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
5but unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect.
Because Adam gave a sin offering, as required, pointing to our Redeemer, Jesus, his offering was accepted of God, whereas, Cain’s offering was of his own merits, not acceptable to God. A classic illustration of satan and men who think they can lower God to their sinful standards-pride-putting themselves in the place of God.
Then the author goes on to say this:
“He wedded a woman of pre-Adamite stock, and thus compounded his fault. Genesis 43:7 says, "Cain knew [that is, had relations with] his wife." That Cain's wife was of forbidden or strange flesh is borne out later, in Jude 11, in referring to the men of Sodom and Gomorrah, "Woe unto them! for they have gone the way of Cain," that is, seeking after strange flesh.”
Pre-Adamite stock? Where do you find that in the Holy Scriptures? People get themselves in trouble when they go to “outside” sources for their information, that is not inspired by the Holy Spirit. It leads them to trust in the traditions of men instead of God’s Word.
This is what Jude says:
10But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.
11Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.
12These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear…
Cain did not fear the Lord and did things according to his natural inclinations, which were evil, as he had cultivated continuously, the same ultimate sin that the men of Sodom and Gomorrah committed. Yes, they went after strange flesh, which was a “natural” degradation when following their own ways, born from the sins of refusing to follow and give glory to God, based on their pride of self.
We only need to trace through the history of mankind and their refusal of God’s love, it only leads to evil, continuously.
The author has a biased view because he is trying to weave everything together to come to a conclusion, so he uses sources that lead to his conjectures.
This author also states this:
“Naamah's revelries with her blood relative, Ham, resulted in the Curse of Canaan”
This is what scripture says:
Genesis 9:18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan….24And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
25And he said, Cursed be Canaan;
Ham was the middle son, yet Noah knew what his YOUNGER son had done unto him, as Canaan is referred to twice within this narrative. Back then, they didn’t refer to them as grandsons, they were referred to as sons. Thus, while reading the scriptures without preconceived notions, it would appear that Canaan raped his grandfather Noah and was discovered by Ham, who went and told his two brothers.
Agreed. Was going to post a video of his, but there is too much conjecture which turns almost anyone with balanced internal self-debate capabilities.
I always enjoy your detailed comments.
#WriteMore
I also like to reflect on the Word, letting scripture interpret scripture, understanding the words they used then may be misinterpreted because of our definitions for those words now. That is why we can’t cherry-pick scripture. It misrepresents the true meaning and context, causing confusion-satan’s usual ploy. I also enjoy our conversations, it solidifies my faith in God and His Word. Blessings
Had a hard copy of this video. As we eluded, much conjecture; he needed a publicist.
This is what got him labelled as an anti-semite.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qGdSWfD1Ad0