Substack Can Fuck Off - Just Another Form of Totalitarian Censorship
Substack Normalizing Mao's Cultural Revolution
Substack versus the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - how can anyone support the continued degradation of our fundamental rights by online platforms? Has the medium finally completely overtaken the message?
“All media work us over completely. They are so pervasive in their personal, political, economic, aesthetic, psychological, moral, ethical, and social consequences that they leave no part of us untouched, unaffected, unaltered. The medium is the message. Any understanding of social and cultural change is impossible without a knowledge of the way media work as environments. All media are extensions of some human faculty - psychic or physical.” - Canadian Philosopher Marshall McLuhan
Citizens at War with Media (Substack)
Substack and other online media outlets have continually degraded our civil rights and liberties until the point where most believe it acceptable that opinion and free speech censorship is a necessity… for freedom. The current situation is that I have been banned from communicating with my fellow citizen due to my opinion. Yes, my opinion is wrecking the world, apparently.
Yet we blindly follow the media positioned opinions of conflicted and colluded “experts” like Dr. Malone. We used to think that conflicts of interest were a “thing”, but now media shoves these conflicted humans down our throat ad nauseum. Cui Bono?
Media is highjacked by the same group that highjacked medicine. The same group that highjacked the CIA and more recently, academia. This same group has highjacked politics long, long ago, and are now infringing on the rights of citizens around the world.
“You can’t have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat. How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?” - Substack (re: Fuck your Canadian Charter of Rights)
Highjacked! Wash, Rinse, Repeat
From US Congressional Record - February 9, 1917 Vol. 54 - pages 2947-2948 - House Representative Calloway
“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, ship-building, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of the, to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.
“These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of daily press throughout the country. They found it was necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.
“This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations as to the present condition of the United States Army and Navy, and the possibility and probability of the United States being attacked by foreign foes.
"This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served. The effective. ness of this scheme has been conclusively demonstrated by the character of stuff carried in the daily press throughout the country since March, 1915. They have resorted to anything necessary to commercialize public sentiment and sandbag the National Congress into making extravagant and wasteful appropriations for the Army and Navy under the false pretense that it was necessary. Their stock argument is that it is ' patriotism.' They are playing on every prejudice and passion of the American people."
https://www.congress.gov/bound-congressional-record/1917/02/09/house-section?p=0
Mao’s Four Olds & the New Red Media Guard
Censorship is censorship. All of it is unacceptable and the fact that Substack feels worthy of deciding if our opinion is correct, seems to be the issue here. Why? How? What gives Substack the right to decide on whether our thoughts are correct or not?
The co-founder of Substack, Chris Best, thinks “Society has a trust problem”. But that is like saying the victim of abuse has a problem of trusting others and it is the abused fault. Mao said: “War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.” Well apparently Chris Best thinks that censorship is the only way to solve OUR trust issues from being lied to by media for 100 plus years. See the way the communist mind subverts; your government/institution is here to save you from the problems they created.
Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, Old Ideas - Replaced with the “News”
Substack and current media are masters of polarization. You are either “this” or “that”, black or white. Or more apropos: Black or Red.
After Mao launched the Cultural Revolution, cities and towns fell into chaos as the Red Guard flooded the streets with propaganda and fear. All families were separated into Red or Black Families, where the Red Families were those that sided with Mao, and the Black Families that were against Mao. The Black Families were punished for their actions and were quickly separated into the Five Black Categories: landlords, rich peasants, counter revolutionaries, criminals and rightists; and were henceforth labeled as the biggest threats to the Chinese people.
“Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy.” - Mao Tse-tung
Xi Van Fleet - Growing up in the Cultural Revolution
The Charter affirms the right to express your opinions -- unless they run counter to the whims of Mr. Trudeau who is more likely to ban you, smear you, get you fired, and/or seize your bank account than the folks hosting these posts. Trudeau and the WEF overlords would make a better target.