Does "the virus" Exist

Fraud on a Global Scale?

Post One of Many to Come

The Big Question is: Do we trust communist China?

Well, we have already found that the spike protein does exist, and by itself, fulfills Koch’s Postulates. But does SARS-CoV-2 exist and also fulfill Koch’s Postulates? Well the interesting part is yes, on paper it does, but we NEED to trust a lone Chinese communist group for their peer-reviewed science that apparently isolated a specific and novel piece of the viral proteins from three bronchoalveolar-lavage samples of Chinese humans from Wuhan… just outside communist China’s only level-4 microbiology lab.

In their research, they identified four distinct and novel genome fragments which made SARS-CoV-2 novel. These identified ‘novel’ pieces, combined with the other 85% of genome structure that it shares with other coronavirus became the future sequence utilized for PCR-RT and all other comparative studies and research. They used error correction to fill in the gaps of the main sequence.

Work on top of this that ALL patients used to develop the PCR testing nucleotides were in the Wuhan market, just outside Wuhan Institute of Virology. Even the first “isolated” case in the United States had visited Wuhan’s wet market right before coming to the US. (link here)

“On January 19, 2020, a 35-year-old man presented to an urgent care clinic in Snohomish County, Washington, with a 4-day history of cough and subjective fever. On checking into the clinic, the patient put on a mask in the waiting room. After waiting approximately 20 minutes, he was taken into an examination room and underwent evaluation by a provider. He disclosed that he had returned to Washington State on January 15 after traveling to visit family in Wuhan, China. The patient stated that he had seen a health alert from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about the novel coronavirus outbreak in China and, because of his symptoms and recent travel, decided to see a health care provider.”

“Clinical specimens were tested with an rRT-PCR assay that was developed from the publicly released virus sequence. Similar to previous diagnostic assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), it has three nucleocapsid gene targets and a positive control target. A description of this assay and sequence information for the rRT-PCR panel primers and probes are available on the CDC Laboratory Information website for 2019-nCoV.”

Questions:

1.) Do we trust the CDC or worse the communist Chinese CDC?

2.) If no to above, then HOW can we trust anything that has been tested since, when the entire sequence from China was uploaded?

3.) Does everyone realize that the testing to gather the genome of “the virus” was done at Wuhan, by Wuhan, and then written up by Wuhan Institute of Virology staff?

4.) Does everyone realize that we are only utilizing a small portion of the viral genome for PCR and other testing?

Summary:

The people manufacturing the bioweapons in Wuhan were the ones also testing the gene sequence, from the market right outside the China’s ONLY level 4 microbiology lab - Wuhan Institute of Virology. The other feature of Wuhan? It was the home of the original 5G roll-out in China and began Nov 2019.

Koch’s Postulate Answered?

1.) The organism must always be present, in every case of the disease.

• Answer: nope - we have found that GP-120 and EMF radiation can cause SARs - both present in all infections, even without SARS-CoV-2.

2.) The organism must be isolated from a host containing the disease and grown in pure culture.

• Answer: only the first time in China - the rest were based on original uploaded sequences of this first isolation

3.) Samples of the organism taken from pure culture must cause the same disease when inoculated into a healthy, susceptible animal in the laboratory.

• Answer: Not really - there have been thousands of separate and distinct variations found (Tunisian and Korean isolations do not match exactly)

4.) The organism must be isolated from the inoculated animal and must be identified as the same original organism first isolated from the originally diseased host.

• Answer: Nope. Again, the gold standard being used to answer this postulate is this study.

“We isolated infectious virus using Vero E6 cell culture from the lung, and observed SARS-CoV-2 particles using electron microscopy. However, the virus was not isolated from the lungs of HB-01-infected wild-type mice or mock-treated hACE2 mice along the detecting timeline, which suggests that human ACE2 is essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication in mice. Moreover, we found specific IgG antibodies against the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 in the sera of HB-01-infected hACE2 mice” - *easily caused by spike protein alone*